The Recursive Astrology · an interpretation, not a prediction

Archetypal Astrology — planets in relationship

Loading…

Honestly, first: inspired by Richard Tarnas's archetypal astrology (Cosmos and Psyche, 2006; The Passion of the Western Mind). Every reading below is PlayfulProcess's interpretation, written with an AI from its knowledge of his work — not Tarnas's words, not his endorsement. Go to the source: cosmosandpsyche.com ↗

Tap one planet to read its archetype and hear every voice in this library; tap a second to read the complex between them.

Tap a planet above to read its archetype and hear every voice in this library answer for it. Tap a second planet and the relationship between them — the place Tarnas's whole method actually starts — reads too.

How this works. Tapping one planet looks up its own archetype in Archetypal Astrology — planetary pairs (hand-authored, not generated) and stacks every other voice grammar's entry for that planet beneath it — Planetary Myths, Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos, Lilly's Christian Astrology, the Jyotiṣa Bṛhat Jātaka, Alan Leo, and the Canonical synthesis — read live from grammars/_collection.json, the same cross-grammar matching the Lenses viewer uses. Tapping a second planet adds the complex between the two, from the same hand-authored grammar, above both stacks. This is the meta layer: not a second generator script, but the parents' many voices stacking beneath their own or their pair's synthesis, live, on every load. See docs/DESIGN-archetypal.md.